Two Rooms: The Musical… NOT.


Rakhee Totally rocks… not that you can tell from this picture.

Alex’s first play this summer is Lee Blessing’s Two rooms. It’s painfully, heart-wrenchingly horribly sad. It’s the story of a husband and wife. He is blindfolded, handcuffed and regularly beaten by his Lebanese terrorist captors. She, back home, lives in self-imposed isolation and austerity, to share the experience with him, since she can’t get him released.

Rakhee Sapra (above) plays the wife. Alex plays the State Department worker assigned to manage her. There are only four actors, but it’s very powerful. That means people (possibly including me… I admit nothing) cry. Last night, the show got a standing ovation. Yay! I didn’t even start it! Yay!

I must say that all four actors are outstanding, my wife most wholeheartedly included.

Sadly, the show right before it (it’s been double-billed) is, in my opinion, not so good. It’s an interesting effort by a student writer, but it seems to boil down to all the sexual, scatological and drug content of shows like Up in Smoke and Clerks, without any of the original or socially redeeming bits.

On the plus side, the people who aren’t frightened away by that tend to really appreciate something substantial and satisfying right afterward.

Go Alex!

Addendum after a sort of creepy anonymous comment on this post (hinting at the possibility of negative social consequences of my negative statements), I have decided to expand my review of the play preceding Two Rooms. I wouldn’t want people to think I just hated it, flat out. In fact, the first play had some strong points. There were several chuckles and a few belly laughs yanked from my abdomen, and some of the physical acting and comedic timing was especially humorous. The actors, most of the time, put forth solid efforts. Unfortunately, the writing seemed to me, as I have mentioned, a collection of clichéd comedic elements from a style of movies that have become ubiquitous and played-out in recent years. I had the distinct impression that the shock-value-humor element was overdone in the context of the other elements, leaving me with a bad taste in my mouth and insufficient justification for having acquired it. Part of this bad taste involved a little gratuitous sexual prejudice and some probably-unintentional-but-still-problematic victim blaming and/or misogyny. However, I am still impressed by the fact that an undergrad wrote this. It flows nicely from moment to moment, it has coherent plotting, it has reasonably well-defined characters, and (as I said before), there are some genuinely funny moments. By the standards of professional scripts, it would not fare well, but by the standards of undergraduate work, I suspect it shines quite respectably.

2 comments ↓

#1 Anonymous on 06.13.08 at 3:56 pm

D, Google finds all your blogs.. just so you know, and your other blogs make it obvious who you are..

#2 bobbyfiend on 06.13.08 at 10:31 pm

This would be disturbing to me if I were truly trying to hide my identity. I’m not. You, however, are, although your IP address gives up some basic info.

Any comments on the content of this post? If you want to say something unrelated, I’m sure you can google my email address. If this post has offended you in any way, let me know. One reason I put this particular post here and not other places (like facebook) is because this post included a negative review of a play put on by people who are friends of friends. If said people are interested enough in the review to look up a blog that is outside the internet circles they usually roam in, then I hope they are also prepared to read an honest opinion about the play, and perhaps have a conversation about it. I’m certainly open to dialogue, and my opinions on things like this are rarely fixed in stone. If it’s upsetting that I didn’t like Low Lifes very much, let me know why I should have had a more positive opinion.

But if you’re just trolling, then move along.

Leave a Comment

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.